Structure Analysis
Thesis Statement
In the opening paragraph [Sec #1], the last sentence points out the plan to protect Arctic sea ice. It mentions the method to scatter a thin layer of reflective glass powder
and the purpose protect it from the Sun’s rays and help ice grow back.
So the highlighted sentence is the thesis statement.
As planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise, some have been driven to explore desperate measures. One proposal put forward by the California-based non-profit Arctic Ice Project appears as daring as it is bizarre: to scatter a thin layer of reflective glass powder over parts of the Arctic, in an effort to protect it from the Sun’s rays and help ice grow back.
Essay Outline
- [Sec. #2] - The melting ice has impacts to the globe, and some scientists are afraid that geoengineering will damage the ecosystem.
- [Sec. #3] - Field uses silicon to reflect the sunlight and the project has save the ice from melting.
- [Sec. #4] - Scientists consider the act is out of well-intention, but some worry about the glass beads may affect the ecosystem.
- [Sec. #5] - The geoengineering plan cannot replace reducing carbon emission.
The key phrase rising sea levels
is the statement of the impact of the melting ice, and scientists worry that geoengineering
will cause further damage
to the ecosystem.
The word silicon
states the material used in the saving of melting ice, and the phrase encouraging results
indicates the success of the project.
The statements of the worry of the glass beads are that the beads could block sunlight from photosynthesising plankton
, and the beads may be eaten by zooplankton
.
Why geoengineering is not a replacement is that geoengineering only treat single symptoms
.
Coherence & Cohesion
[Sec. #2]
Coherence
- Para #1 - As the first paragraph follows the thesis statement, the paragraph first explains why people save the melting sea ice. In the first sentence of the paragraph
The melting of the sea ice has...
the key phraseThe melting of the sea ice
is linked to the thesis statement. - Para #2 - In the first sentence
As planet-warming greenhouse gas...
the wordgeoengineering
refers to the ice saving plan mentioned in Section #1.
Cohesion
- Para #1 - In the third sentence
Some say it’s already disrupting...
the author uses a pronounit
to referthe melting of sea ice
in the first two sentences and create connection. - Para #2 - After the first sentence
Many scientists frown upon...
the author uses a linkerhowever
to connect the next sentencethe utter lack of...
as a contrast.
[Sec. #3]
Coherence
- Para #1 - In this paragraph the first sentence starts with
Field launched the Arctic Ice Project...
, which is mentioned in Section #2. Then the paragraph elaborates how the project works by explaining theglass beads
used in the plan and saying that theyoung ice
will be protected first in the project. - Para #2 - In the next paragraph the subtopic moves to the result of the project. In the sentence
Field doesn’t want to carpet…
theparticularly fast-melting, vulnerable areas
refer to areas where have theyoung ice
and then has a connection to the first paragraph of the same section.
Cohesion
- Para #1 - In the last two sentence
She found a manufacturer that turns...
the author repeats the keywordbeads
when describing what the beads are made of, and that is the strategy of repetition. - Para #2 - In the second sentence
For instance, in a pond in Minnesota,…
the author uses linkerFor instance
to give an example and elaborateencouraging results
in the end of the first sentence.
[Sec. #4]
Coherence
- Para #1 - In the first paragraph of Section #4, the subtopic focuses on worries to the
glass beads
from other scientists. The second sentenceIf they float around there…
connects to the phraseso they’ll float on water
in the first paragraph of Section #3 to state the worries of the floating glass beads. Also the key phrasereflecting sunlight
connects to the sentenceDepending on how much light the silica beads reflect...
pointing out how the floating beads affect the Arctic food chain by blocking sunlight. - Para #2 - In the next paragraph the subtopic keeps focusing on the
glass beads
. The phraseto test their impact on plankton ecosystems
is linked back to one of the problems aboutArctic food chain
in first paragraph of the same section.
Cohesion
- Para #1 - In this paragraph, again the author uses the linker word
however
to point out that some biologists worry about the effect of the glass beads in contrast to Field’s positive attitude toward the glass beads. - Para #2 - In the last sentence of this paragraph
It may be an eye-watering figure…
, the author use the pronounit
to refer to the phrase$1-5bn (£800m to £4bn) annual bill
, which is mentioned in the prvoius sentence.
[Sec. #5]
Coherence
- Para #1 - In the first sentence of the last paragraph
Researchers are exploring the feasibility...
, the key wordgeoengineering
appears again, and it is linked to Section #2.
Cohesion
- Para #1 - In the sentence
Rather, she sees it as a chance…
the author uses the pronounit
to refer to the key wordgeoengineering
.
Take-home Message
In the last paragraph, the author quotes Field’s words. Field agrees that geoengineering cannot solve the climate change issue once and for all, and it is in no way a replacement for reducing carbon emissions.
The need to reduce carbon emissions is still urgent, and the geogineering is a way can buy more time for people to reduce carbon emissions.
Researchers are exploring the feasibility of other geoengineering approaches to save the melting Arctic, but none come without problems. One, for instance, would entail building millions of wind-powered devices to pump water from the deep to the ice surface in order to build up thicker layers of ice – which is energy-intensive and might not be very effective, Bitz says. She and Serreze view such approaches as stop-gap solutions to climate change, in that they only treat single symptoms – in the case of silica dust, temperatures – while doing nothing about the root cause of it. If Field’s strategy works as intended, “that’s wonderful,” Bitz says, “but I know that not emitting CO2 in the first place will work.” Field agrees that geoengineering is in no way a replacement for reducing carbon emissions. Rather, she sees it as a chance to buy the time needed for world economies to decarbonise and stave off the worst impacts of climate change. The silica beads, she says, are “the backup plan I hoped we’d never need.”